It was all over the Web today (here for example) that Amazon is revising the pricing model for publishers and offering them a better cut of the action (roughly 70% of the price). There are various stipulations but in essence Amazon is trying to get the publishers to offer their books on the Kindle and offer them relatively cheaply. More thoughts on this later. [Day Job Sucks This Week]
With the all but confirmed iTablet set to debut next week, Apple also appears to be entering the eBook market, most likely through their pervasive iTunes Store, which can be access by virtually any computer with an iPod. I don't know the number of iPods vs. the number of Kindles but it's not close.
The timing of this makes it look like a desperate ploy by Amazon to proactively combat what has been dubbed the Kindle Killer. By why so little and so late? Amazon could have become the dominant eBook reader. They had the best device on the market for at least a year and arguably the best marketplace for selling eBooks.
But rather than enticing readers and publishers, they squandered their advantage. Amazon should have taken the long-tail approach and offered Kindle for a drastically low price ($100-$200) and tried to drive prices down as much as they could by offering publishers 70% of the cut much earlier. With a projected $.06 distribution cost (to be paid by the publisher) there is plenty of extra margin to entice the publisher and cut the costs compared to physical books. Video game publishers do this all the time with the intention of making up on the cost on the back end. With basically no cost scaling for additional copies (i.e. limitless supply), eventually you will make back the money.
They also could have aggressively pursued something like my reader enticement program (suggested here) to lower the buy-in for readers. Instead they continued to sell expensive eBooks with a high initial purchase price. I'm interested in eBooks but if I'm going to drop 300+ on an eReader it's going to be something I can dual purpose. That's why I'm waiting to see what Apple brings to the table.
But it's too little too late. The Kindle Killer appears to be looming around the corner with all of the hype and the interest. Hopefully, Amazon will be able to still sell books that are viewable on the iPod. I actually strongly suspect that this is the case, because the only way Amazon's actions make sense is if they were intending on being a third party seller all along and merely used the Kindle as a Beta test for their distribution system all along. At the same time, I think their competing music stores might sour any potential partnership. Ahhhh, who knows? I guess we will see next week.
While I'm not a fan of the Amazon DRM, I do like the steps they have taken recently with the Kindle for PC app (where is the Mac app..still waiting), the new sdk announcement, and the new revenue split you mentioned above. I like that they are at least being proactive at trying to keep the ebook price down. While I own a macbook and an iPhone, I don't see Apple working quite so hard at setting an upper price limit on ebooks.
ReplyDeleteThat being said, I do agree that they have wasted a huge opportunity to really by the "ipod/itunes" of the ebook world. I think if they had moved to support epub last fall, we would have seen less companies displaying potential ereaders at CES. Maybe with the new SDK, someone will port the FBReader app to the Kindle and give it the epub support lots of folks have been hoping for. Of course, that assumes Amazon will allow alternative reading software on the Kindle..but thats a different question.
The Apple tablet would have a regular screen, most likely, versus an ebook reader's screen (easy on the eyes). Sure, people might use it as an e-reader but the eye strain would probably be prohibitive. I guess I can't really see any basis for your argument. I will likely buy an Apple tablet because I'm an apple whore, but it won't replace my Kindle for book-readin'.
ReplyDelete